Victor Tiberius (2017): Seasteads. Creating New Small Societies From Scratch



In this essay, I discuss seasteads as new small societies on the open sea, their potentials for freedom and progress, and the prerequisites for their success. I start the paper with the notion that thinkers like futurists, utopists, and philosophers have always investigated alternative societal configurations. Unlike utopias, we are now facing a technologically feasible option to make these thought experiments come true.

As seasteads are located beyond the jurisdiction of nation-states, they do not come under any national laws, thereby circumventing the legal restrictions that limit human actions. Seasteads are, therefore, artificial settlements on which societal frameworks can be designed from scratch. When there are many different seasteads, a large variety of societal approaches can be realized and experimented with. Time will show which systems stand the test. As seasteads are small, the effects of these experiments are limited to a rather small group of people who voluntarily commit themselves to a specific system.

What are the drivers for the development of seasteads? I take a look at a couple of current societal shortcomings of mankind and I especially focus on those that concern current political systems and governments. The dissatisfaction with these circumstances pushes certain individuals—whom I call pro-active and productive—into escaping as they realize that reforms of the current systems are hardly or not possible at all. For them, liberal seasteads represent a fresh start without those restrictions and shortcomings.

The criticism presented here doesn’t claim completeness. Other critics would probably focus on other problems they regard as more pressing (e.g., capitalism in general, corporatism, social injustice, poverty, etc.) and come to other conclusions. As stated before, any societal system can be realized and experimented with on seasteads. Also communist, monarchist and other seasteads are feasible.

Seasteads with coherent values will attract individuals who share these values and pursue similar personal goals. Unlike in large (democratic) nation-states with heterogeneous values that confusedly meander from crisis to crisis, seasteaders can single-mindedly head towards bringing their visions to life.

Based on the presented criticism and because I regard liberal seasteads as the most promising ones that also will be given the most approval by pro-active and productive individuals and groups, I further discuss liberal designs of seasteads. They explicitly won’t regard themselves as states, but non-state societies with as few public matters as possible. However, there are some issues that have to be structured and regulated. Therefore, I investigate aspects of settlement policy, public goods policy, internal and external security policy, financial policy (trying to avoid taxes in the conventional sense to the maximum extent possible), future regulations, and on how to keep political issues as small as possible in the long run. Avoiding the proliferation of state-like structures is an important matter if a liberal seastead is to stay liberal. While at the time of writing there is hardly any research on this topic, I present a few of my own thoughts.

There is so much more that has to be discussed when it comes to seasteads, as they face the same numerous and manifold matters the existing populations on the mainland have to deal with plus some additional—especially technological—ones. This volume certainly can’t cover them all. Therefore, I mention some further aspects that others are currently discussing and suggest some ideas that future discussions should focus on.

I conclude the essay with a positive outlook. The driving circumstances, the available technological solutions, and the striving actors make the realization of seasteads more likely than ever. Where seasteads face greater than expected challenges, charter or private cities could represent an alternative to the alternative.




1    Starting From Scratch: From Thought Experiments to Reality
2    Seasteads as Multiple, Alternative Societal Experiments
3    Seasteads vs Utopia
4    Political and Governmental Shortcomings as Drivers for Seasteads
4.1    Crisis of Democracy
4.1.1    Lack of Future Orientation vs Excessive Actionism
4.1.2    Representative Democracy: Unattached Rule by Administrators
4.1.3    Democratic Show: Rule by … Even Someone Else
4.1.4    (In)justice in Voting Rights
4.2    Governmental Mismanagement and Nation-State Deficits
4.3    Oppressive Nation-States
4.4    Nation-State Failure: Problem Summary
5    Fight or Flight: Withdrawal from Society?
5.1    The Pro-Active, Productive Individual
5.2    Seasteads as Communities of Shared Values
6    Liberal Seasteads as Small Communities with Reduced Public Policy Matters
7.    Design of Liberal Seasteads
7.1    Settlement and Population Policy
7.2    Public Goods Policy
7.3    Internal and External Security Policy
7.4    Financial Policy (without Taxes)
7.5    Future Regulations: Development of New Rules
7.6    Keeping Public Matters Small and Avoiding State Proliferation
8    Contributions in this Volume
9    Further Aspects
9.1    Architecture and Infrastructure
9.2    Foreign Relations and Trade
9.3    Energy Supply
9.4    Waste Disposal
9.5    Finance, Currency and Monetary Transactions
9.6    Media and Culture
9.7    Food and Water Supplies
9.8    Defense
10    Conclusion




Acemoglu, D./Robinson, J. A. (2012): Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York.

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Berkowitz, L.  (ed.): Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, New York, 267-299.

Agamben, G. (1998): Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford, California.

Akerlof,  G.  A./Yellen, J. L. (1990): The  fair wage-effort  hypothesis  and unemployment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(2): 255-283.

Alewell, D./Nicklisch, A. (2009): Wage Differentials and Social Comparison: An Experimental Study of Interrelated Ultimatum Bargaining. International Review of Law and Economics 29(3): 210-220.

Ansoff, H. I. (1975): Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals. California Management Review 18(2): 21-33.

Arrow, K. J. (1994): Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge. American Economic Review 84(2): 1-9.

Balloun, O. S. (2010): The True Obstacle to the Autonomy of Seasteads: American Law Enforcement

Barnard, C. I. (1938): The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Bass, B. M. (1991): From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. Organizational Dynamics 18(3): 19-31.

Beck, U. (1992): Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity, New Delhi. First published 1986 as “Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne”, Frankfurt.

Blau, P. M. (1964): Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York.

Bloch, E. (1984): The Principle of Hope, Cambridge, Massachusetts. First published in 1954, 1955, and 1959 (three volumes).

Burns, J. M. (2003): Transforming Leadership. The Pursuit of Happiness, New York.

Burt, R. (1992): Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Callinicos, A. (2000): Equality, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Caplan, Bryan D. (2007). The Myth of the Rational Voter. Princeton, New Jersey.

Carlyle, T. (2010): On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History, New York, New York. First published in 1841.

Collins, S. G. (2005): “No Anthropologist aboard the Enterprise”: Science Fiction and Anthropological Futures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 36(2): 182-188.

Crouch, C. (2004): Post-Democracy, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Dahrendorf, R. (1958): Out of Utopia: Toward a Reorientation of Sociological Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 64(2): 115-127.

Darwin, C. (1874): The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed., London.

Davis, J. C. (1981): Utopia and the Ideal Society: A Study of English Utopian Writing 1516–1700, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Donaldson, S. & Kymlicka, W. (2011): Zoopolis. A Political Theory of Animal Rights, Oxford.

Durkheim, E. (1995): Die Regeln der soziologischen Methode, 3. Ed., Frankfurt/Main.

Dworkin, R. (1977): Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Emerson, R. M. (1976): Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 2: 335-362.

Etzioni, A. (1993): The Spirit of Community. Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda, New York.

Feinberg, J. (2008): Psychological Egoism. In: Feinberg, J. & Shafer-Landau, R. (ed.): Reason & Responsibility. Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy, Stamford, Connecticut, 520-532.

Fichte, J. G. (1794): Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre, Jena, Germany.

Forster, W. F. (1833): Two Lectures on the Checks to Population, Oxford.

Foucault, M. (1977): Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison, New York.

Friedman, P./Taylor, B. (2012): Seasteading: Competitive  Governments on the Ocean. Kyklos 65(2): 218-235.

Frye, N. (1965): Varieties of Literary Utopias. Daedalus 94(2): 323-347.

Gamble, A. (2000): Politics and Fate. Writings on Politics and Economics, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Giddens, A. (1986): The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkley and Los Angeles.

Giddens, A./Pierson, C. (1998): Conversations with Anthony Giddens. Making Sense of Modernity, Stanford, California.

Granovetter, M. (2005): The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(1): 33-50.

Graus, F. (1967): Social Utopias in the Middle Ages. Past & Present 38: 3-19.

Gray, J. (2002): Straw Dogs. Thoughts on humans and Other Animals, London.

Hardt, M./Negri, Antonio: Empire. Globalization as a new Roman order, awaiting its early Christians, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Harvey, C. P./Allard M. J. (2014): Understanding and Managing Diversity. Readings, Cases, and Exercises, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Heidegger, M. (2004): Brief über den “Humanismus”, in: von Herrmann, F.-W. (Ed.): Martin Heidegger—Wegmarken, Frankfurt am Main, 3rd ed., 313-364. First published 1946.

Hodgson, G. (2007): Meanings of Methodological Individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology 14(2): 211–26.

Homans, G. C. (1958): Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology 63(6): 597-606.

Hoppe, H.-H. (2001): Democracy. The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order, Rutgers, New Jersey.

Huntington, S. P. (1996): The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, London.

Jameson, F. (1982): Progress versus Utopia; Or, Can We Imagine the Future? Science Fiction Studies 9(2): 147-158.

Jonas, H. (1984): The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technological Age, Chicago. (Translated from German, originally published in 1979.)

Jurisdiction over Homesteads on the High Seas, Edited by The Seasteading Institute, Palo Alto.

Klein, Naomi (2008): Shock Doctrine. The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, Toronto, Canada.

Krugman, P./Wells, R. (2012): Microeconomics, 3rd ed., New York.

Lee, D. R. (1989): The Impossibility of a Desirable Minimal State. Public Choice 61(3): 277-284.

Levitas, R. (1979): Sociology and Utopia. Sociology 13(1): S. 19-33.

Levitas, R. (2003): Introduction: the elusive idea of utopia. History of the Human Sciences 16(1): 1-10.

Lyon, D. (2003): Surveillance after September 11, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Lyon, D. (2015): Surveillance after Snowden, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

MacIntyre, A. (1981): After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory, Notre Dame, Indiana.

Margalit, A. (1996): The Decent Society, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Musgrave, R. A. (1987): Merit Goods. In: Eatwell, J./Milgate, M./Newman, P. (Ed.): The New Palgrave, London, 452-453.

Nelson, R. H. (2005): Private neighborhoods and the transformation of local government. Washington, D.C.

Nietzsche, F. (1980a): Die Fröhliche Wissenschaft. In: Colli, G./Montinari, M. (Ed.): Kritische Studienausgabe, Vol. 3., Munich, Berlin, and New York, 343-651. First published in 1882.

Nietzsche, F. (1980b): Morgenröte. Gedanken über die moralischen Vorurteile. In: Colli, G./Montinari, M. (Ed.): Kritische Studienausgabe, Vol. 3., Munich, Berlin, and New York, 9-331. First published in 1881.

Nietzsche, F. (2006): Thus Spoke Zarathustra. A Book for All and None, Cambridge, England. First published in 1883.

Nussbaum, M. (2006): Frontiers of Justice. Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

OECD (2016), General government spending (indicator), (doi: 10.1787/a31cbf4d-en), accessed on 12 August 2016.

Olson, M. L. (1982): The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, Connecticut.

Osborne, E. (2000): Multiculturalism, and Ethnic Conflict: A Rent-Seeking Perspective. Kyklos 53(4): 509–526.

Parkinson, C. N. (1957): Parkinson’s Law or the Pursuit of Progress, London.

Piketty, T. (2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Quandl (2016): China General Government Total Expenditure, % of GDP,, data from 18 May 2016, accessed on 12 August 2016.

Rancière, J. (2004): Disagreement. Politics and Philosophy, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Rawls, J. (1999): The Law of Peoples. Cambridge.

Romer, P. M. (2010): Technologies, Rules, and Progress. The Case for Charter Cities. Washington, D.C.

Rosenblatt, G. (2010): The Engagement Pyramid: Six Levels of Connecting People and Social Change,, accessed on 20 August 2016.

Rothbard, M. N. (1982): The Ethics of Liberty, Atlantic Highlands, Ney Jersey.

Saage, R. (2001): Utopische Profile. Bd. 1: Renaissance und Reformation, Münster, Germany.

Sandel, M. (2009): Justice. What’s the Right Thing to Do? New York.

Sen, A. (2006): Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny, New York.

Simmel, G. (1892/93): Einleitung in die Moralwissenschaft. Eine Kritik der ethischen Grundbegriffe. Vol. 1, Stuttgart and Berlin, Germany.

Simmons, R. T. (2011): Beyond Politics: The Roots of Government Failure. Oakland, California.

Simon, H. A. (1947): Administrative Behavior. A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, New York.

Simon, H. A. (1956): Rational Choice and the Structure of Environments. Psychological Review 63(1), 129-138.

Singer, P. (1979): Practical Ethics, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Sinn, S. (1992): The Taming of Leviathan: Competition among Governments. Constitutional Political Economy 3(2): 177-196.

Sloterdijk, P. (1999): Regeln für den Menschenpark. Ein Antwortschreiben zu Heideggers Brief über den Humanismus, Frankfurt am Main.

Smith, A. (1776): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London.

Steinberg, P. E./Nyman, E./Caraccioli, M. (2012): Atlas Swam: Freedom, Capital, and Floating Sovereignties in the Seasteading Vision. Antipode 44(4): 1532-1550.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2013): The Price of Inequality. How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future, New York.

Suárez Müller, F. (2012): Postmoderne als Zukunft ohne Ankunft. Das endlos Kommende in der postmodernistischen Philosophie. In: Tiberius, V. (ed.): Zukunftsgenese. Theorien des zukünftigen Wandels, Wiesbaden, 231-261.

Taylor, C. (1992): Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity, Boston, Massachusetts.

Thoreau, H. D. (1864): Walden or Life in the Woods, Boston, Massachusetts.

Tiberius, V. (2010): Didactics of Futures Studies. Journal of Futures Studies 14(4): 135-146.

Tiberius, V. (2011a): Towards a “Planned Path Emergence” View on Future Genesis. Journal of Futures Studies 15(4): 9-24.

Tiberius, V. (2011b): Hochschuldidaktik der Zukunftsforschung, Wiesbaden, Germany.

Tiberius, V. (2012): Theorien des Wandels—Theorien der Zukunftsgenese? In: Tiberius, V. (ed.): Zukunftsgenese. Theorien des zukünftigen Wandels, Wiesbaden, 11-54.

Tiberius, V./Rasche, C. (2016) (Ed.): FinTechs. Disruptive Geschäftsmodelle im Finanzsektor, Wiesbaden, Germany.

Vanberg, V./Kerber, W. (1994): Institutional Competition among Jurisdictions: An Evolutionary Approach. Constitutional Political Economy 5(2): 193-219.

von Hayek, F. A. (1948): Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago.

von Humboldt, Wilhelm (2002): Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen, Stuttgart, Germany. First published in 1851.

von Mises, L (2011): A Critique of Interventionism, Auburn, Alabama. First published in 1929 as “Kritik des Interventionalismus. Untersuchungen zur Wirtschaftspolitik und Wirtschaftsideologie der Gegenwart”, Jena.

von Mises, L. (1949): Human Action. A Treatise on Economics, New Haven, Connecticut.

Walzer, M. (1983): Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality




Victor Tiberius (2017): Seasteads. Creating New Small Societies From Scratch, in: Victor Tiberius (Ed.): Seasteads. Opportunities and Challenges for Small New Societies, Zurich (vdf), pp. 3-63.

Kommentare sind geschlossen